What to improve
- Task given
- Feedback verifiable
Today’s successes. How do harnesses, teams of agents, people in the loop and post-training get more out of the same setup?
ProposalICLR 2027 workshop
Agents make progress when a person specifies the task and supplies a verifier on every answer. Real research often gives neither. This workshop is about what an agent does then.
We have proposed this workshop and its challenge for ICLR 2027. ICLR decides on November 29, 2026.
Today’s successes. How do harnesses, teams of agents, people in the loop and post-training get more out of the same setup?
Most real research. How does an agent verify, replicate and try to refute a result it produced itself?
The last mile. How does an agent choose a question, judge its novelty and decide when to drop it?
Alex DimakisUC Berkeley · Bespoke Labs
Azalia MirhoseiniStanford · Ricursive Intelligence
Ofir PressSWE-bench · ProgramBench
Yuandong TianRecursive Superintelligence
Matei ZahariaUC Berkeley · Databricks Harnesses, search, sampling and evolutionary methods
Coordination, division of work and review among agents
Post-training on research runs, RL and synthetic data
Replication, falsification and evidence agents make themselves
Reward hacking, benchmark leakage, gains that do not transfer
Hypothesis generation, novelty and research taste
People as collaborators, verifiers and sources of taste
Verifiable, open-ended computer science tasks
Systems research, kernel optimization, algorithm discovery
An open-ended problem in AI for AI R&D
Every team gets the same problem and the same budget. Let your research agents work on it alone, or collaborate with them. The winners present at the workshop.






